2) The conspiracy I'm talking about IS about Christianity. This is not something I just made up, go google it. It's been quite popular in debates before, but nonetheless illogical. I really don't even know where you're trying to go with this. I would have thought that if you liked seeking knowledge you would not have so many misconceptions in your head. Now you're questioning the existence of Jesus? There are several historic, both Jewish and secular (Roman) that documented Jesus' life. Entire epistles were wrote about His life by men that followed Him (this is relevant because these men then spread the message, you would think if Jesus never existed these people would have noticed). The evidence goes on.
Okay, I stated that some of the writing in Medu Netcher is religious. You called all of Medu Netcher a conspirarcy. medu Netcher does not all deal with religion so Medu Netcher, in general, is not a conspiracy (the book of the dead is what you should proclaim as a conspiracy not the actual writing, that would be silly).
As, for the comment about questioning Jesus existence. I never said I question the existence but certain people in a religion does. I am not religious but I am all about history. There was conflict between some religious folk (Christain and Jewish) because the Jewish community believe in Jesus, but not as a divine figure (some people believe that Jesus is divine). Also many "writings" on Jesus have been discovered to be fakes. Also, you should know that semite(excuse spelling) is not limited to hebrew persons of Asia(Middle East I do not agree with) Semite is also in upper parts of Africa (focal point Ethiopia, however) and also parts of Europe. The Asian Hebrews contribute their racial background to both Europeans and Africans (Don't worry I took Anthropology and got a A). Please read
The Africans who wrote the Bible-Ancient secrets Africa and Christianity Have Never Told, (2002) Because you need to read from more sources than the European ones that you have been reading because they will have a limited view that suits their best interest. Also, look up and watch
cheikh anta diop videos or read his book, he is a world reknowed scholar who uses evidence that the people themselves made and were discovered and accepted by people from around the world. Watch his video about the origin of man.
3) I'm simply making conclusions based on what you've said so far. From your previous posts you've always talked about all the religious people against homosexuality, multiple times, and are still doing it, so I figured you must think all religious people are like crazy homophobics. And by the way questioning my sanity has absolutely nothing to do with this debate.
I guess you don't like dry humor. I think you may have misread my previous posts and took it the wrong way. I have nothing against religious institutions or others that the institutions have problems with. I didn't understand why you tried (and failed) at figuring out what I was trying to say. I never said all religous institutions and I never used he word homophobic (many religoius institutions have homosexual attendees so that would be an absurd comment)
I think I mentioned religion as a side note. That means that it is just a mention but does not need to be gone into.
I hate the sin not the sinner. Unfortunately people are too biased to accept that answer. They enjoy riding on people's religious beliefs and then mocking them for stuff they've never even claimed. I've just become used to it.
That is a really nice comment. It goes along with the hypocrite thing I was talking about (you know priest and certain people thing that was happening).
Also, the questioning of your sanity, I admitted to being inappropiate earlier, so please excuse my even drier humor but doing the same thing to me made no sense. I questioned your sanity because you blew off the handle and I din't understasnd how you could interpret my writing to be "name-calling" the religious institutions. As, I said earlier I don't beat around the bush so that was your own mis-interpretation.
I don't really understand how people can let things become such a big issue over nothing(talking about gay marriage topic). People cannot define something from writings that came before them. I mean Roman Catholics(Ancient) were all about Christanity but they( not the ENTIRE population) also enjoyed homosexuality, so I can't understand how someone can get homosexuality as a great evil from a book when the people who were actually around during the writing did not.