Two new signature tutorials
Started by Vitalis, Aug 29 2008 03:37 PM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 29 August 2008 - 03:37 PM
#2
Posted 29 August 2008 - 03:43 PM
Your PoP one is grand, though like you said, definately need some knowledge of photoshop . Can't get the liquify signature to load though .
#3
Posted 29 August 2008 - 04:32 PM
Liquify img doesn't load, Prince of Persia one looks very cool i may work my way through it later
#4
Posted 29 August 2008 - 04:42 PM
Odd. It loads for me. Reuploaded anyway. See if it works now.
#5
Posted 29 August 2008 - 06:18 PM
Yup works now ;D
on the bit where it says "add a c4d that isn't too obvious" what did you actually add? i can't see a new c4d xD
on the bit where it says "add a c4d that isn't too obvious" what did you actually add? i can't see a new c4d xD
Edited by Just Another User, 29 August 2008 - 06:20 PM.
#6
Posted 30 August 2008 - 05:52 AM
QUOTE
on the bit where it says \"add a c4d that isn\'t too obvious\" what did you actually add? i can\'t see a new c4d xD
It was a very subtle addition. Can you see it now?
Edited by Vitalis, 30 August 2008 - 05:53 AM.
#7
Posted 30 August 2008 - 07:57 AM
i can't see a difference between the two, lol.. but i love the sigs really..
#8
Posted 30 August 2008 - 08:09 AM
There's like a greeny-blue bit going from bottom left to top right in a diagnol in the bit he's circled, sort of over her shoulder area (if she had that area and it hadn't already been pretty-fied ).
Anyway, I can see it now, two lovely tutorials . Mind if I add an intermediate category to them both? Just so that it comes up if people want to view all tutorials that are...well..intermediate . (intermediate is just because of the level of knowledge you assume within the reader, it doesn't in anyway reflect on the quality of the sig )
Anyway, I can see it now, two lovely tutorials . Mind if I add an intermediate category to them both? Just so that it comes up if people want to view all tutorials that are...well..intermediate . (intermediate is just because of the level of knowledge you assume within the reader, it doesn't in anyway reflect on the quality of the sig )
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users