Do you believe in god?
#326
Posted 28 January 2010 - 05:59 PM
#327
Posted 28 January 2010 - 06:34 PM
#328
Posted 28 January 2010 - 07:02 PM
Yeah I would hope that's not what she'd want. but who knows? She's really into it... "might become a pastor" that into it
She's protestant then?
#329
Posted 28 January 2010 - 07:29 PM
#330
Posted 29 January 2010 - 08:29 AM
#331
Posted 29 January 2010 - 10:51 AM
#332
Posted 29 January 2010 - 12:54 PM
I believe in God, just don't believe he's all powerful.
Whats your definition of god then
#333
Posted 29 January 2010 - 04:12 PM
#334
Posted 29 January 2010 - 04:41 PM
Edited by Devilfish, 29 January 2010 - 04:42 PM.
#335
Posted 29 January 2010 - 05:18 PM
Thought it was a good idea at the time...
#336
Posted 31 January 2010 - 07:35 PM
Yeah, well, I think it's really weird that people have this need to be part of a deity fan club even if they intend on breaking the rules from the start. A person with webbed toes is not a duck. He may want to be a duck, he may desperately call himself a duck and show his freaky stinky toes to everyone he pleases, but he's not a damn duck. He hasn't got a bill, or feathers, or any of that ducky stuff.
That's how I see religion. You can love your neighbor until you're blue in the face, and kudos for that, but until you start believing dudes humping dudes is a sin and Satan is out to get you, you're not a Catholic. You're just a Christian-inspired nice guy. Which sounds like it should be good enough for anyone, but for some strange reason, that doesn't seem to be the case. I think that's very, very strange.
What the hell is the point of living a good life if you're doing it out of fear? It's pointless, and takes the fun out of spirituality anyways. I don't do drugs anymore, but I don't do it out of the fear that God is going to punish me, I do it because theres a beauty to life inside and outside me that makes not doing drugs much more joyful than doing them. Whats really sad too is you have a lot of atheists, hardcore scientific types, that know this much better than a large population of Christianity, who choose to wallow in ignorance and resistance instead of reality.
#337
Posted 05 February 2010 - 12:45 AM
I think it is completely insane and completely sickening to me.
But then again, I have respect for people who believe because I find it completely unfathomable to believe in something so much. To be ready to do something so radical, to ensure your place in heaven, like some do. PUHLEASE. But if it makes you happy and a good citizen, than thats awesome. Just don't look down on other people or shove your bible in their face. I can't stand bible thumpers.
I am only interested in tru fax.
What I can see and what I can touch.
#338
Posted 05 February 2010 - 02:25 AM
I strongly believe there is no 'god'. No afterlife, no reincarnation, and no soul.
I think it is completely insane and completely sickening to me.
But then again, I have respect for people who believe because I find it completely unfathomable to believe in something so much. To be ready to do something so radical, to ensure your place in heaven, like some do. PUHLEASE. But if it makes you happy and a good citizen, than thats awesome. Just don't look down on other people or shove your bible in their face. I can't stand bible thumpers.
I am only interested in tru fax.
What I can see and what I can touch.
So you're willing to completely dismiss the possibility of their being a God? PUHLEASE. I think it is completely insane and completely sickening to me that people are willing to discount the idea of creation when our knowledge of the universe is so limited. Some of the greatest minds of our age believed in the possibility of their being a God, as do I. I'm not talking about a large man in white robes and a beard who watches over us at night and listens to our prayers; religion is crap.
I just think it's arrogant to dismiss the possibility of the creation of our universe when too little information is known.
#339
Posted 05 February 2010 - 02:52 AM
Your believe in something.. at all; even in yourself is a form of faith and therefore can be considered a religious belief.
but an actual answer to the question at hand.. It doesn't matter to me if there is a lack of scientific proof, I believe there is a higher power, I don't denounce the christian form of "god" I personaly just chose not to worship "him"
Incidentally, a more direct answer... I believe in goddess. We all come from the earth. and that there is scientific proof of
#340
Posted 05 February 2010 - 04:03 AM
It doesn't matter to me if there is a lack of scientific proof, I believe there is a higher power
While there is no scientific proof to support creation, there is no scientific proof to dispute it either. Sure, science can tell you what most likely occurred in the first moment of the big bang, but it provides no explanation of its cause.
Edited by Artificial, 05 February 2010 - 04:04 AM.
#341
Posted 05 February 2010 - 06:15 AM
*evidenceWhile there is no scientific proof to support creation, there is no scientific proof to dispute it either. Sure, science can tell you what most likely occurred in the first moment of the big bang, but it provides no explanation of its cause.
And you're right, there's no evidence that refutes "creation" in general, because it's totally nonspecific. "Creation" tells us absolutely nothing.
As for specific theistic creation stories, there's plenty of evidence to trash those.
#342
Posted 05 February 2010 - 07:03 AM
isnt that 'god' in some kind of way? not god then, but more 'mother earth'
#343
Posted 05 February 2010 - 07:06 AM
Seems like pointless obfuscation to me...you can also see 'creation' in a more physical sense: how the earth got created, how all living beings are somehow connected (dna and such, and how we need eachother to survive)
isnt that 'god' in some kind of way? not god then, but more 'mother earth'
#344
Posted 05 February 2010 - 07:58 AM
Need pics or it's not real applies here for me
#345
Posted 05 February 2010 - 08:52 AM
#346
Posted 05 February 2010 - 08:56 AM
Really?Saying "there's no proof for religion" is as ignorant as the religious people saying "you don't need proof"
Can you provide some evidence for the truth of any specific religion?
#347
Posted 05 February 2010 - 05:17 PM
While there is no scientific proof to support creation, there is no scientific proof to dispute it either. Sure, science can tell you what most likely occurred in the first moment of the big bang, but it provides no explanation of its cause.
and this is true... this is why i debate all of the time with people.. I believe there is a higher power.. and that may be god or what have you. But myself, and all others are so small in comparison to the entire universe...so no one can ACTUAL know the truth. For all we know god could be a small pigme man with a spear hiding under the left side of your dresser, waiting to stab your feet if you don't change your underwear.
#348
Posted 05 February 2010 - 06:35 PM
And you're right, there's no evidence that refutes "creation" in general, because it's totally nonspecific. "Creation" tells us absolutely nothing. Specific theistic creation stories, there's plenty of evidence to trash those.
Did OP ask for specifics? Topic title is 'Do you believe in God', which last time I checked had different meanings to different people. God is directly linked to creation, so to discuss one is to discuss the other. You're very first post in this topic was 'No', which I can only assume means you're interpretation of the word was from a Christian standpoint. Obvious answer is obvious. Anybody with an even average IQ should be able to dismiss religion as the work of fanatics, whose existence today derives from the fact that it has been taught as the sacred truth for thousands of years.
http://en.wikipedia....ussell's_teapot
If we disregard religion, then all that's left is the possibility of creation, which may or may not have been the result of a higher power. Sure it's nonspecific, but the truth is there are no specifics when attempting to bridge science with theology. It's easy to hide behind that keyboard of yours and refute the posts of pro-religious members in this thread, but I haven't seen you discuss your own beliefs even once. I take it then, that you're an atheist; a word of Greek descent which roughly translates to 'no God'. While you may have provided logical explanations regarding the fallacies of Christianity, all you have seemingly disproved is the existence of the Christian God. You don't win a debate by solely discussing the flaws of the opposing argument, you have to discuss your own.
So tell me, why isn't there a God?
#349
Posted 05 February 2010 - 06:48 PM
#350
Posted 05 February 2010 - 08:34 PM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users