1730 replies to this topic

[Sweeney]

I was definitely wrong when I thought we were getting anywhere with this. As with every other discussion regarding religion on this forum (and almost certainly every other discussion regarding religion which has ever taken place in history) it's near impossible to persuade somebody to question their beliefs when they're so embedded.

I changed someone's mind about BBT, once. On RD.net
That was a good day.

[pabs123]

I changed someone's mind about BBT, once. On RD.net
That was a good day.

pardon my ignorance but what is BBT and what is RD.net :$

[emerkeng]

no i dont... and pathentic don't call out people for judging you without meeting you, i believe you said to someone on the other thread that if you met them they'd be a retarded disabled person or something of the like

that was just a joke am i not allowed to insult/joke with someone and the guy youre referring to posted above you and has the first post at the top page where he assumed I was emo so I was just insulting him too =).

[Lychee]

that was just a joke am i not allowed to insult/joke with someone and the guy youre referring to posted above you and has the first post at the top page where he assumed I was emo so I was just insulting him too =).

Ableism is totes funny now and on par to calling someone emo. Also, about your assumptions - "he"?

[Sweeney]

that was just a joke am i not allowed to insult/joke with someone and the guy youre referring to posted above you and has the first post at the top page where he assumed I was emo so I was just insulting him too =).

Baww.
Someone called you emotional, because you ragequit a thread.

[emerkeng]

Ableism is totes funny now and on par to calling someone emo. Also, about your assumptions - "he"?

Err if you don't know if they're a guy or a girl what are you supposed to say he/she every other sentence? That's not an assumption it's a way of reffering to people if you don't know if they're a guy or a girl or if theyre a guy so that's not an assumption =).

[pabs123]

Baww.
Someone called you emotional, because you ragequit a thread.

well that's the same thing he did, he called someone a disabled retard because he lost an argument, totally acceptable as well

[Lychee]

Err if you don't know if they're a guy or a girl what are you supposed to say he/she every other sentence? That's not an assumption it's a way of reffering to people if you don't know if they're a guy or a girl or if theyre a guy so that's not an assumption =).

No, I believe it to be an assumption. Which makes it true.

[Sweeney]

Err if you don't know if they're a guy or a girl what are you supposed to say he/she every other sentence? That's not an assumption it's a way of reffering to people if you don't know if they're a guy or a girl or if theyre a guy so that's not an assumption =).

How about the delightfully gender-neutral "they"?

[emerkeng]

How about the delightfully gender-neutral "they"?

They is a plural so it wouldn't work )=

[Sweeney]

They is a plural so it wouldn't work )=

"They" can be plural, but it can also be singular.
Just like "you".

[emerkeng]

"They" can be plural, but it can also be singular.
Just like "you".

I'm a plural? Alright so how would this sentence work.
They went to the movies.
He went to the movies.

To a rational person wouldn't that sound completely different?

Edited by pathentic, 18 July 2010 - 05:52 PM.

[Lychee]

They is a plural so it wouldn't work )=

Objection.


they
  1.nominative plural of he, she, and it.
2.people in general: They say he's rich.
3.(used with an indefinite singular antecedent in place of the definite masculine he or the definite feminine she): Whoever is of voting age, whether they are interested in politics or not, should vote.

Edited by Cellophane, 18 July 2010 - 05:51 PM.

[iargue]

No, I believe it to be an assumption. Which makes it true.

I cannot stop laughing. I think I will die .

Sadly you do have a philosophical point

[Waser Lave]

They is a plural so it wouldn't work )=

They can be singular or plural depending on the context.

[Sweeney]

I'm a plural?

No, you're "pathentic".

[pabs123]

I'm a plural? Alright so how would this sentence work.
They went to the movies.
He went to the movies.

To a rational person wouldn't that sound completely different?

LMFAO...that's great... he meant the word "you" is plural or singular, not that you, panthetic, are plural..w/e that could possibly mean

Edited by pabs123, 18 July 2010 - 05:55 PM.

[Lychee]

LMFAO...that's great... he meant the word "you" is plural or singular, not that you, panthetic, are plural..w/e that could possibly mean

It mean a sad, sad day for humanity.

[Sweeney]

"Someone punched me today!"
"Were they arrested?!"

Singular.

[iargue]

THIS IS A TOPIC ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF GOD, NOT ABOUT GRAMMAR.


Please focus.

[Sweeney]

I thought it was a topic about demonstrating that this person was a moron

[emerkeng]

LMFAO...that's great... he meant the word "you" is plural or singular, not that you, panthetic, are plural..w/e that could possibly mean

its a joke . . .

[Waser Lave]

I thought it was a topic about demonstrating that this person was a moron

I believe that has already been established as fact and so we moved on.

[emerkeng]

I thought it was a topic about demonstrating that this person was a moron

I resent that I am a Christian not a moron =) two different meanings two different words and I am entitled to my beliefs =) and I guess you guys are too . . . =)

[Sweeney]

I believe that has already been established as fact and so we moved on.

NO IT'S STILL A THEORY

I resent that I am a Christian not a moron =) two different meanings two different words and I am entitled to my beliefs =) and I guess you guys are too . . . =)

Luckily, they're not mutually exclusive.
You'll be pleased to know that you are, in fact, both