All public programs, all for free!
#26
Posted 10 July 2009 - 11:46 AM
#27
Posted 10 July 2009 - 12:00 PM
Yay i have 50+ posts during this week yay!
Yay, I have 14480+ posts during this week, yay!
Good move
Hello Robert!
#28
Posted 10 July 2009 - 12:46 PM
Good move
Not seen you on the boards for ages Robert .
#29
Posted 10 July 2009 - 04:12 PM
My .02
#30
Posted 10 July 2009 - 04:14 PM
#31
Posted 10 July 2009 - 04:17 PM
#32
Posted 10 July 2009 - 04:19 PM
I think something very important that needs to be remembered is to put such things as AB lists and USAB lists on the forums as opposed to in the program file. At least they have to come on the forums for thatWell, programmers could create problems on purpose to make the forums more active. But that would be evil though
#33
Posted 10 July 2009 - 04:24 PM
I think something very important that needs to be remembered is to put such things as AB lists and USAB lists on the forums as opposed to in the program file. At least they have to come on the forums for that
Yeah, though I don't know if you've heard, but we're making loadable lists obsolete. People will be able to load them, but we're planning to just network this one. We have the items database reconstructed and the front-end is almost done.
#34
Posted 10 July 2009 - 05:49 PM
#35
Posted 10 July 2009 - 06:08 PM
Don't be evil .
A site that has content and is being updated develops its own community. We don't need to work on the community to have it develop.
#36
Posted 10 July 2009 - 06:29 PM
#37
Posted 10 July 2009 - 09:06 PM
We realize this.That may apply to some people, but you can't deny that majority will just abuse the use of the programs. It's good and all that you are looking at the best of people, but face it, everyone is a douchebag deep down inside and some are just looking for a way to abuse the system.
#38
Posted 10 July 2009 - 11:31 PM
Although that is great use of technology available AND revolutionary in the cheating scene, I see it hurting us as a site. I just don't think new people are going to use the forums. At all.Yeah, though I don't know if you've heard, but we're making loadable lists obsolete. People will be able to load them, but we're planning to just network this one. We have the items database reconstructed and the front-end is almost done.
#39
Posted 10 July 2009 - 11:50 PM
But they will be using our programs, right? If so, mission accomplished. If they talk on the forums, that's a plus.Although that is great use of technology available AND revolutionary in the cheating scene, I see it hurting us as a site. I just don't think new people are going to use the forums. At all.
I'll tell you what will hurt us though. Doing nothing, and defecting to other sites like some other people have been doing.
#40
Posted 11 July 2009 - 03:01 AM
There seems to be a lot of emphasis on getting people to post. I'm kind of surprised by some suggestions to purposely cripple programs to get people to come to the forums. This is the wrong way to look at things. If we make people happy, they will hold a good view of Neocodex. If we have a lot of problems, they may come to the forums once or twice, but eventually they will get tired of the problems.
Don't be evil .
A site that has content and is being updated develops its own community. We don't need to work on the community to have it develop.
You could also look at it the other way and say it's not about punishing new members who don't post but to reward the older members who have stuck with us for a long time.
Personally I'd be a supporter of reducing the post count necessary for advanced and having slightly differing versions of the big programs for each level. It can also help a lot with populating the database depending on how you do it.
#41
Posted 11 July 2009 - 09:31 AM
Also if we reduce the amount of posts to get Adv. Member, we run the risk of having a bunch of people spamming. It would have to be high enough so that they can't do it in a sitting, but not something that takes half a year to achieve.
#42
Posted 11 July 2009 - 10:24 AM
After some deliberation, I think we might be able to afford including some easter eggs in the major programs for the higher ups. Just so long as these functions are actually being used, because presently, no one is wanting to climb the ranks just to use programs.
Also if we reduce the amount of posts to get Adv. Member, we run the risk of having a bunch of people spamming. It would have to be high enough so that they can't do it in a sitting, but not something that takes half a year to achieve.
If they spam just take 2 posts off them for every spam post. They'll soon learn that it's not worth it.
#43
Posted 11 July 2009 - 12:28 PM
That's more work for us and I'd rather concentrate my efforts on development rather than catching spammers .If they spam just take 2 posts off them for every spam post. They'll soon learn that it's not worth it.
#44
Posted 11 July 2009 - 03:41 PM
But they will be using our programs, right? If so, mission accomplished. If they talk on the forums, that's a plus.
I'll tell you what will hurt us though. Doing nothing, and defecting to other sites like some other people have been doing.
Isn't it like over 9000 times better if they praise you while using the programs? Jokes. But seriously, if I had the ability to make programs like these, I would want it so atleast they are used by people who are much more deserving of it than random people who register just for the programs and ditch it. I understand your reasoning by saying no one really has the demands for the programs and such, but that's sort of expected. This site has evolved from a mainly neopets related forum board to just a general board. Obviously it's still focused on neopets, but people grew old of it because they matured from it or just found it started to suck (like myself).
#45
Posted 11 July 2009 - 08:18 PM
Yay, I have 14480+ posts during this week, yay!
Hello Robert!
I feel I am in a disadvantage...
Maybe people like you are into hacking much more than you ever think! Omg I don't think my fingers will ever move again if I posted that much.
#46
Posted 11 July 2009 - 09:53 PM
I HAD TO POST 500 POSTS TO GET MAH FURST PARGRAMM NOW PPL DONT EVEN NEED 2 DO THAT WTF UNFAIR! *BAWW*
#47
Posted 11 July 2009 - 10:05 PM
I'm just restocking legitly, everything else is fair game to me.
#48
Posted 11 July 2009 - 11:34 PM
But in all fairness, some may have considered SOME of my stuff spam... but I tried to remain in the constraints.
I'm all for additional features. That will add incentive for people to stay interested.
#49
Posted 12 July 2009 - 05:40 AM
#50
Posted 12 July 2009 - 09:53 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users